Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

NURB 361: Introduction to Nursing Research

For Suzi White's students

Scholarly vs. Popular Sources

  Scholarly Popular
Authors: Experts such as scientists, faculty, and historians

Generalists, including bloggers, staff writers, and journalists; not always attributed

 

Examples: The Library Quarterly, New England Journal of Medicine, Nineteenth Century Literature, and books from university presses such as Oxford University Press. 

Wikipedia, CNN.com, About.com; People Magazine, USA Today; bestselling books; books from popular publishers like Penguin and Random House

 

Focus: Specific and in-depth

Broad overviews

 

Language: Dense; includes academic jargon

Easier to read; defines specialized terms

 

Format: Almost always include: abstracts, literature reviews, methodologies, results, and conclusions

Varies

 

Citations: Include bibliographies, citations, and footnotes that follow a particular academic style guide

No formal citations included; may or may not informally attribute sources in text 

 

Before publication: Evaluated by peers (other scholars) 

Edited by in-house editors or not edited at all

 

Audience: Specialists in the subject area: students, professors and the author's peers

General readers; shouldn't require any special background

 

Design: Mostly text, with some tables and charts; very little photography; no advertising

Glossy images, attractive design; photo illustrations and advertising are more common

 

Purpose:

communicating research findings; education

 

entertainment; news

 

 

Entirety of chart comes from Berkeley Library.

Berkeley Library. (2021 Feb 16). Evaluating resources:  Scholarly & popular sources. University of California. https://guides.lib.berkeley.edu/c.php?g=83917&p=3747680